Review Detail

 
Pandora's Box System
Home Study Courses (Books, DVDs, CDs, MP3/ Video)
52 of 71 people found the following review helpful

"Innovative and Powerful..."

Overall rating 
 
5.8
Effectiveness 
 
8.0
Ease of Implementation 
 
4.0
Innovativeness 
 
9.0
Packaging/ Customer Service 
 
6.0
Value for Money 
 
3.0
Reviewed by
The FACT is DiCarlo has taken a leap in female psychology here. This is based on well researched science and it is VERY effective IF applied properly, which as we all know is a MUST when dealing with women on a sexual level.

I didn't sign up for the online interviews which were way out of my price range, but the book itself is jam packed with pretty powerful information that relates to a woman's fears about sex and relationship.

I asked a women the "three strange questions" and she was immediately turned on. I got a flurry of IOI's after each question and by the time she has answered the last (i.e. third) question she was looking at me like she was ready to jump me right then and there.

The three questions are:

1) Do you TEST with several guys at once, or do you INVEST with only one guy at a time?

2) Do you JUSTIFY sex as something done only for fun, or do you DENY the past so that each time is special?

3) Do you IDEALIZE being taken care of, or are you a REALIST who is ready to take care of herself?

You will have to read Di Carlo's Pandora's Box system in order to find out why these questions are so powerful.
Help other users find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? 

Comments

Ordering 
 
Written by emilio
February 18, 2012
Which book are you referring to in this sentence: "the book itself is jam packed with pretty powerful information"?

E.
Written by Brainbuster
July 07, 2013
Sorry, but contrary to what the author told you, Pandora's Box is not based on "well-researched science."
(and your ALL CAPS doesn't lend credibility when trying to convince us of it.)

I realize that Vinny says that the concept is based on dozens of books and hundreds of hours of interviews, but that is not science.

I won't even touch on the fact that this is based on interviews of women.
Everyone in the community knows how unhelpful women's dating advice is for men.

No one on Vinny's team is a scientist or a psychologist.
None of them would even know how to read a peer-reviewed scientific study.
Vinny Dicarlo probably doesn't even know what "peer-reviewed" means, or why it is important.
The only studies I've seen Vinny cite are from the 1960's and 1970's.
A scientist would never do that.
Not even a student in a "soft" science like psychology would do that.
I have a Masters in psychology (not even a Ph.D.), and they do not permit citing studies from that long ago...for several good reasons. Yet Vinny calls this "Hard-Core Science."

There are thousands of studies relevant to this topic done in the latest decade. Why would a scientist be forced to reference one study from 40 years ago, and another study from 30 years ago? There have been hundreds of thousands of studies conducted in the latest decade on male-female relationships, liking, arousal, sexual attraction, and personality types.

With all due respect (to the reviewer), how could you possibly believe a man like Vinny Dicarlo could be scientific?

2 results - showing 1 - 2